TEL Communities
Helen Caldwell and Anna Cox | View as single page | Feedback/Impact
|
TEL Communities Definitions: Theoretical background relevant to technology facilitated social learning Research evidence: Systematic literature reviews on the theme of technology facilitated social learning |
Role of the learner: technology stewards
The online community allows for dynamic interaction between tasks, instructors and learners. Instructors and moderators undertake the role of facilitators, asking questions and supporting interactions, and can be equally involved in learning from each other (Holt and Willard-Holt 2000). As Herrington et al., (2010 p.23) contended, often it is the person who has recently acquired the skill who is the best position to share the key elements of the constructs. Kirkwood (2006) suggests the learning affordances of Web 2.0 applications (such as wikis, blogs, and social bookmarking) assist the self-organizing creation of CoPs as self- regulating knowledge networks in which individuals are motivated to participate. In negotiating these, members become enculturated into the community’s practices, language, and behaviours. Numerous commentators have stressed the importance of including some face-to-face communication in a virtual CoP in order to build trust (Kimble et al., 2000). More about the changing nature of knowledge in online environments: https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/chapter/section-2-4-does-technology-change-the-nature-of-knowledge/ The website and blog complementing the book, Digital Habitats: stewarding technology for community (Wenger et al., 2009): http://technologyforcommunities.com/ Image source: Nancy White (http://www.fullcirc.com/) : https://www.slideshare.net/elsua/communitybuilders-online-community-still-crazy-after-years-with-nancy-white References: Herrington, J., Reeves, T.C. and Oliver, R. (2010) A Guide to Authentic e-Learning. Routledge, New York. Holt, D. G.; Willard-Holt, C. (2000). "Lets get real – students solving authentic corporate problems". Phi Delta Kappan 82 (3) Kimble, C., Hildreth, P. & Wright, P. (2001). Communities of Practice: Going Virtual. In Y. Malhotra (Ed.) Knowledge management and business innovation, Hershey, PA: Idea Group (220-234). Kirkwood, A. and Price, L., 2006. Adaptation for a changing environment: Developing learning and teaching with information and communication technologies. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 7(2). Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press. Wenger, E., White, N. and Smith, J.D., 2009. Digital habitats: Stewarding technology for communities. CPsquare. Wenger, E., White, N. and Smith, J.D., 2009. Digital habitats: Stewarding technology for communities. CPsquare. |
From Lave and Wenger (1991) onwards, socialisation among members has been emphasised as an important and defining factor in the procedure of building a Community of Practice. Wenger et al. (2009) introduced the term ‘technology stewardship’ to describe how the role of cultivating an online CoP is often taken on by an individual or small group actively playing a facilitating role within the community. Peer support and encouragement appear to have a huge impact on peer to peer learning. Wenger et al. (2009) note that when a new member brings a new element into the practice this may pull the competence of the whole community along if they accept or adopt it, resulting in the newcomer becoming the teacher.